How About Andre Ethier for Mets?

The Dodgers promoted super-duper prospect Yasiel Puig this week, and all the Cuban defector has done in his first two games is go five-for-eight with two home runs and five RBIs. When Carl Crawford and Matt Kemp come back from the disabled list, they will have one outfielder too many. The odd man out would likely be Andre Ethier, which might pave the way for a trade. Could the Mets be a landing spot?

andre ethier
Could Andre Ethier make Citi Field his permanent home?

There is a huge caveat here, and that is Ethier’s salary, which is huge, indeed. His five-year, $85 million contract started this season. The Dodgers are already regretting it, what with Ethier having fallen out of favor with manager Don Mattingly.

Andre Ethier is very good, but he isn’t $17 million per season good. Ethier is having a rough season, batting just .234 with four home runs and 15 RBIs. Ethier is pretty much a 20-homer, 85 RBIs, .285-type hitter. So he’s not a superstar, just a solid piece of the puzzle. Considering Ethier is already 31 years old, he is probably worth around $8 million per season.

Which means the Dodgers would likely have to eat around half of his contract to make him attractive to the Mets. Depending on the caliber of prospect(s) the Dodgers get in return, I could see them doing it.

I would not trade Zack Wheeler for him. I don’t think I would even deal Noah Syndergaard, who has been drawing raves this season. The Mets would have to give the Dodgers players who are just a notch below them, like a Michael Fulmer or a Rafael Montero. Both of those pitchers have a lot of potential, but you have to give quality to get quality. Plus, the Mets have an abundance of young pitching. They can afford to give up some of it to improve the rest of the team.

The Mets would be smart to wait and see if the Rockies might deal Carlos Gonzalez. He is better and younger (27) than Andre Ethier, but there are concerns that Gonzalez is a product of Coors Field. He is in the third year of a seven-year, $80 million contract.

I might give up Syndergaard for Gonzalez, but not Wheeler. If the Mets would not trade Wheeler for Justin Upton, there is no way they would deal him for Gonzalez. The only player for whom I would trade Wheeler is Giancarlo Stanton, but I don’t think he is going anywhere.

The Rockies are in the midst of a playoff race, only 2.5 games out of first place, so they are unlikely to make such a deal if they are still contending. But if they fall by the wayside over the next two months, anything is possible.

In any case, I actually believe Sandy Alderson this time when he said the Mets could be buyers at the trade deadline. I think he realizes he cannot acquire a new outfield in one off season, so it’s time to start adding pieces. It’s been time to start adding pieces for two years now, but that’s besides the point.

5 thoughts on “How About Andre Ethier for Mets?

  • June 8, 2013 at 9:49 am
    Permalink

    I think now is the time to get him. His stock is way down but if the Mets decide to eat a little more of the contract he might be had for some B prospects rather than a blue chipper. Don’t think I would trade Syndergaard unless Dodgers ate almost the whole contract. Think he is the real deal and may end up being a huge regret for Toronto.

  • June 8, 2013 at 9:52 am
    Permalink

    N-O! He is 31 with a 5 yr commitment, we need younger more talented players. When has he ever been good except for that contract season??

  • June 8, 2013 at 10:09 am
    Permalink

    A smart baseball person would have to look towards Grady Sizemore with the addition of Either. Mets need more help than just those two, but it’s a start. The Mets should start knocking on the door of Choo in Cincinnati free agent soon, upgrade from Elsbury because Choo stays healthy and has proved he could be a lead off guy. He just wants a place to settle down for the family. He is not staying in Cincinnati they have too many talented outfielders on the rise.

  • June 8, 2013 at 10:59 am
    Permalink

    Absolutely not. At 31 we don’t know if his current numbers represent a temporary decline or the beginning of a real one…..we can’t take the chance. We can use the $8 million or so in pursuit of younger, more promising players.

  • June 8, 2013 at 4:42 pm
    Permalink

    At $8 million a year the Mets would not be totally dumb to this if, and ONLY IF, they give up no prospects of any real value at all. No Monteros, no Fulmer. I’m talking Colin Hughes maybe or Danny Muno. And this is exactly why no Etheir deal will be done. The Dodgers will either find a really dumb team, dumber than the Mets or they will not be able to swallow their pride and trade Ethier for so little value.

    Really though, I would say just don’t do it. I don’t even like it that much at $8 mil a year and giving up no prospects. I’d be OK with three years at $8 million but by the 4th or 5th year it will definitely be money thrown in the trash. And maybe sooner than that. Think Jason Bay – disaster because we paid him $18 million a year, but still would be a mini-disaster at $8 mil a year.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Why ask?